jasproof.blogg.se

Pic of supreme
Pic of supreme










pic of supreme pic of supreme

Since 1941, the group photograph has been taken in the Supreme Court Building, which helped standardize it even further. The Court eventually settled on some ground rules-for example, posing together only after a new Justice arrived, and in an arrangement based on seniority. While this custom probably began at the urging of Washington photographers interested in print sales, it ended up becoming one of the Court’s most popular and enduring traditions.įor 75 years after the first group photograph in 1867, the Justices gathered occasionally for a succession of several talented photographers who had just as many approaches for portraying the Justices.

pic of supreme

Other international helplines can be found at /rcip/ visual cues say “Supreme Court” as well as its group photograph. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support on 08. Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available from the following organisations. The US state department has found that Guatemala has done little to protect LGBTQ+ people and that transgender women are subject to frequent threats of violence. She spent most of her time between 20 in Mexico but decided to try to return to the US after a Mexican gang raped and assaulted her. Santos-Zacaria testified that she was raped by a neighbor in the small town in which she was born and that townspeople said they would kill her because of her gender identity and attraction to men. Ten years later, she again entered the US and was taken into custody by immigration authorities. In an opinion written by Ketanji Brown Jackson, the supreme court said the fifth circuit decision was wrong.Īfter leaving Guatemala as a teenager, Santos-Zacaria made it to the US once but was deported in 2008, after a brief stay.

pic of supreme

The fifth US circuit court of appeals ruled against her on that point, but other appellate courts have ruled in favor of immigrants on the same issue. The issue at the supreme court was more technical, concerning whether federal immigration law was flexible enough to allow Santos-Zacaria another day in court. Lawyers for Santos-Zacaria, now in her mid-30s, said she first fled to the US after being raped as a young teenager and threatened with death because of her gender identity in a country that has targeted the LGBTQ+ community.īut a US immigration judge found she did not make a strong enough case that she would face persecution if sent back to Guatemala. The unanimous decision in favor of Estrella Santos-Zacaria gives her another chance to argue that immigration officials were wrong to reject her bid to remain in the US.












Pic of supreme